PhilArchive
open access
Moreland on the Impossibility of Traversing the Infinite: A Critique
A key premise of the kalam cosmological argument is that the universe began to exist. However, while a number of philosophers have offered powerful criticisms of William Lane Craig’s defense of the premise, J.P. Moreland has also offered a number of unique arguments in support of it, and to date, little attention has been paid to these in the literature. In this paper, I attempt to go some way toward redressing this matter. In particular, I shall argue that Moreland’s philosophical arguments against the possibility of traversing a beginningless past are unsuccessful.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Nothing Infinite: A Summary of Forever Finite#723083
- An Attempt to End the Infinite Regress: A Conjecture on the Origin of the Universe——The True Infinite Void Field Matter-Energy Evolution Model (Part II)#722121
- The Codex Process: Equilibrium, Persistence, & Limits of Continuity#167084
- A Universe Fleeing Its Fate: Informational Mechanics and Cosmology through the Lens of the Infinite Boxes Model#695380
- Trinitrian reality#709200
Record · ID 748010
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive