PhilArchive
open access
Smiting Statist Philosophical Philistinism: a Reply to the Thom Brooks Review of _Escape from Leviathan_
It is possible to pose many difficult and fascinating problems and criticisms for the various theses and arguments in Escape from Leviathan (EfL). This occurred while writing it, and various sharp minds did it on reading drafts or the final product. However, some reviews misunderstand, or ignore, what is written and reassert conventional views. But it is best to answer all published criticisms if only to show how they fail, lest anyone thinks they are sound, and even poor criticisms can sometimes elicit elucidation. Thus, we now turn to the review.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Review: János Tőzsér’s _The Failure of Philosophical Knowledge_#715088
- A Critique of “A Critique of Lester’s Account of Liberty”: A reply to Frederick 2013#748051
- Summary of (most of) my criticisms of John Rawls#86535
- Review Essay: Scott Soames's _What is Meaning?_#723135
- On the Fragility of Things (on William Connolly)#769067
Record · ID 748108
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive