PhilArchive
open access
Weaseling and the Content of Science
I defend Joseph Melia’s nominalist account of mathematics from an objection raised by Mark Colyvan
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- James Africanus Beale Horton on Naturalism, Baconianism, and Race Science in Victorian Philosophical Anthropology#77305
- Přínos renesančních učenců historiografii matematiky#778669
- Richard Lavenham’s "De causIs naturalibus": A Critical Edition#744279
- Racial Classification Without Race: Edwards’ Fallacy#713884
- Jamie C. Kassler, Seeking Truth: Roger North’s Notes on Newton and Correspondence with Samuel Clarke, c. 1704–1713#778372
Record · ID 748508
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive