PhilArchive
open access
On the coherence of inversion
In this paper, I shall evaluate a strategy recently used to try to demonstrate the impossibility of behaviorally undetectable spectrum inversion. After showing that the impossibility proof proves too much, I shall identify where it goes wrong. In turn, I shall explain why someone attracted to functionalist and representationalist assumptions might rightly remain agnostic about the possibility of inversion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Coherence Before Integration: λ(c) as an Ontological Precondition for Φ#689279
- "Fundamental randomness" by the "apophatic" Kochen -Specker theorem: Toward a universal method in Hilbert arithmetic's number theory#96645
- Why Observation Cannot See the Whole Observation, Self-Reference, and the Limits of Internal Representation#166993
- Exact Emergence of a Discrete Terahertz Frequency from a Closed Quartic Variational Functional#695900
- Convergence Analysis of Statistical Inverse Problems on Reproducing Kernel Banach Spaces#620797
Record · ID 748832
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive