Response to commentators of Neuroethics

In this reply, I address questions and concerns about Neuroethics raised by a formidable cast of commentators: Amanda Evans, Tyler Fagan, Jonathan Pugh, Daniel Moseley, and Adina Roskies. Their insightful commentaries cover most, if not all, topics within the book, namely: neuroscientific challenges to free will, motivated reasoning and the replication crisis, the brain disease model of addiction, moral responsibility and autonomy in mental disorder, valid consent for brain interventions, and enhancement of moral and cognitive capacities through neurotechnologies.