PhilArchive
open access
The Burden and Order of Proof in WTO Claims: Evolving Issues
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is one of the best dispute settlement mechanisms in the world. Under WTO rules, aggrieved parties must establish a “prima facie” case before the panel can call on the offending party to respond to the claims. The objective of the present study is to critically evaluate the application of the concept of burden of proof underWTOdispute settlement mechanism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- MuPlon: Multi-Path Causal Optimization for Claim Verification through Controlling Confounding#1082979
- 19 U.S.C. § 3539 — Fund for WTO dispute settlements#574768
- Is It Possible to Provide Evidence of Insufficient Evidence? The Precautionary Principle at the WTO#775227
- 16 U.S.C. § 410aaa-49 — Study as to validity of mining claims#571956
- 28 U.S.C. § 1368 — Counterclaims in unfair practices in international trade.#557052
Record · ID 750706
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive