PhilArchive
open access
The _Republic_'s Ambiguous Democracy
Most scholars have thought that in the _Republic_ democracy is supposed to be worse than timarchy or oligarchy, but lately certain commentators have denied that it is. Is it, then? We argue that pursuing this question leads to a dead end: it simply is not clear how bad democracy is supposed to be in the _Republic_. To make our case, we first marshal the strongest available evidence that democracy is supposedly better than timarchy and oligarchy. Next we lay out the strongest available evidence that democracy is supposedly worse. And then we explain why there is an impasse.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Filosofia, poesia e resistência: sobre a unidade entre epistemologia e militância política em tempos de crise#756676
- Deweyan Democracy, Robert Talisse, and the Fact of Reasonable Pluralism: A Rawlsian Response#734432
- Análisis comparativo de las políticas de CTI de las provincias argentinas (2021-2023)#277646
- Democracy and Whole-Process People’s Democracy Through the Four Universal Laws: A Comparative Systems Analysis#111078
- Proposta de um modelo de governança para parques tecnológicos#388480
Record · ID 751471
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive