PhilArchive
open access
“Saving Lives or Saving Stones?” The Ethics of Cultural Heritage Protection in War
In discussion surrounding the destruction of cultural heritage in armed conflict, one often hears two important claims in support of intervention to safeguard heritage. The first is that the protection of people and the protection of heritage are two sides of the same coin. The second is that the cultural heritage of any people is part of the common heritage of all humankind. In this article, I examine both of these claims, and consider the extent to which they align with the current practices that they are intended to justify.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Weaponizing Culture: A Limited Defense of the Destruction of Cultural Heritage in War#112849
- The Ethics of Racist Monuments#719417
- What Should Realists Say About Honor Cultures?#706435
- Community museums and rethinking the colonial frame of national museums in Zimbabwe#185719
- The State's Responsibility in Preserving Local Culture: A Constitutional Law Perspective on the Practice of Akapalumba Jarangk#20485
Record · ID 751799
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive