PhilArchive
open access
Strategies of judicial review. Exercising judicial discretion in administrative cases involving business entities
This report presents the results of a research project which examined how Polish administrative courts exercise discretionary powers when deciding cases related to business activity. When a business enterprise asks the court to review actions taken by administration, judges decide whether an administrative body has used its powers in accordance with the law. The law in this case includes both the relevant statutory regulations but also more general principles originating from other sources, such as the Constitution or European Union law. It is generally accepted that in such cases courts have discretion, i.e. are able to select legal standards on which to base their judgments and to decide how to apply such standards to the case at hand. This does not mean, of course, that administrative court judges can do what they please. But, within some well-established boundaries, they can select from among various rules and principles those legal standards which apply to the case before them, interpret their meaning, and assess their importance. We aim to understand this process
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Legal Regulation of Non-Judicial Methods of Consideration and Resolution of Tax Disputes: Tax Ombudsman, Tax Arbitration and Mediation in Tax DisputesTaxation of Digital Companies: Experience of Russia and Other Countries#19872
- Istota procedury legalizacji pobytu cudzoziemców w Polsce#447699
- PENDELEGASIAN PENGATURAN OLEH UNDANG-UNDANG KEPADA PERATURAN YANG LEBIH RENDAH DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA#1026537
- PENDELEGASIAN PENGATURAN OLEH UNDANG-UNDANG KEPADA PERATURAN YANG LEBIH RENDAH DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA#1026500
- Interpretive Justice in Organizations: A Preliminary Discussion of Problems and Open Questions#695224
Record · ID 751801
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive