PhilArchive
open access
The Implementation, Interpretation, and Justification of Likelihoods in Cosmology
I discuss the formal implementation, interpretation, and justification of likelihood attributions in cosmology. I show that likelihood arguments in cosmology suffer from significant conceptual and formal problems that undermine their applicability in this context.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Regresses, Sufficient Reasons, and Cosmological Arguments#734801
- Gravité et cosmologie#756898
- Circular Explanations, Cosmological Arguments, and Sufficient Reasons#91585
- Peer review The Atacama Cosmology Telescope - DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models Blake Sherwin Cambridge#97125
- The cosmic toolkit for all possible observations: Martin Harwit: Cosmic messengers: The limits of astronomy in an unruly universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 380 pp, $39.99 HB#95476
Record · ID 752122
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive