PhilArchive
open access
Cognitive Science of Religion and Classical Theism: A Synthesis
Launonen and Mullins argue that if Classical Theism is true, human cognition is likely not theism-tracking, at least, given what we know from cognitive science of religion. In this essay, we develop a model for how classical theists can make sense of the findings from cognitive science, without abandoning their Classical Theist commitments. We also provide an argument for how our model aligns well with the Christian doctrine of general revelation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sceptical theists can endorse the fine-tuning argument#77106
- Studies of Christianity; Or, Timely Thoughts for Religious Thinkers#50046
- Hugh J. McCann (ed.), _Free will and Classical Theism: The Significance of Freedom in Perfect Being Theology_#759767
- Nic nadzwyczajnego. Wielki fakt wiary i jego naturalistyczne wyjaśnienie#109432
- The Argument from Collections#752977
Record · ID 752438
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive