PhilArchive
open access
Act Consequentialism and Inefficacy
A variety of eating and purchasing practices, in particular vegetarianism, are often motivated via an appeal to their expected good consequences. Lurking in the background, however, is the question: can I really hope to make a difference via my purchases in a social world as complex and wasteful as our own? I review the evidence as it stands and conclude that there are good reasons to suspect that one probably does not make a difference directly via one's purchases. That said, there may be some related, though less direct, reasons to be vegetarian.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Consequences of Individual Consumption: A Defence of Threshold Arguments for Vegetarianism and Consumer Ethics#116287
- The Effects of Social Responsibility on Consumption Choices#328107
- Cheaper vegetarian meals reduce unhealthy add-on purchases without compensatory spending#654134
- Cheaper vegetarian meals reduce unhealthy add-on purchases without compensatory spending#646417
- Environmental, Health, and Social Consciousness as Drivers of Organic Food Choice.#140807
Record · ID 753401
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive