PhilArchive
open access
Is Atheism Good Evidence for Atheism ? On John Schellenberg’s Argument from Ignorance
The argument from ignorance mounted by John Schellenberg argues from the existence of non-faulty unbelief to the non-existence of God, from the fact of atheism or agnosticism to the truth of atheism. It relies on two putative conceptual relations: between the idea of love and that of personal relationship, and between personal relationship and existential belief on each side of the relation concerning the other relatum. I argue that each is debatable, and so the argument cannot proceed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why Sceptical Theism isn’t Sceptical Enough#773887
- Atheism, agnosticism, noncognitivism (1998)#721083
- New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement#760763
- Paradoxes of Conviction: Are nurtured beliefs irrational?#106460
- On Certainty and Faith: A Perspective on Dogmatic Atheism and Religiosity#113743
Record · ID 753452
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive