PhilArchive
open access
Legal vs. ethical obligations – a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics
While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of 5 rules of what ‘should’ be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Social Robotics as Moral Education? Fighting Discrimination Through the Design of Social Robots#85859
- Toward the ethical robot#736541
- The Future of War: The Ethical Potential of Leaving War to Lethal Autonomous Weapons#774309
- The crying shame of robot nannies: An ethical appraisal#767433
- An Evaluation Schema for the Ethical Use of Autonomous Robotic Systems in Security Applications#710878
Record · ID 754342
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive