PhilArchive
open access
The hard and easy grounding problems (Comment on A. Cangelosi)
I see four symbol grounding problems: 1) How can a purely computational mind acquire meaningful symbols? 2) How can we get a computational robot to show the right linguistic behavior? These two are misleading. I suggest an 'easy' and a 'hard' problem: 3) How can we explain and re-produce the behavioral ability and function of meaning in artificial computational agents?4) How does physics give rise to meaning?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Which symbol grounding problem should we try to solve?#754384
- Coincidence: The Grounding Problem, Object-Specifying Principles, and Some Consequences#111914
- Dissolving the Grounding Problem: How the Pen is Mightier than the Sword#108712
- Grounding, Conceivability, and the Mind-Body Problem#85014
- Developing mathematical thinking through harnessing linguistic diversity#278147
Record · ID 754371
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive