PhilArchive
open access
Attitudinal Objects: their Ontology and Importance for Philosophy and Natural Language Semantics
This paper argues for the philosophical and semantic importance of attitudinal objects, entities such as judgments, claims, beliefs, demands, and desires, as an ontological category distinct from that of events and states and from that of propositions. The paper presents significant revisions and refinements of the notion of an attitudinal object as it was developed in my previous work.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Attitudinal Objects and Propositions#754460
- Sentence, Proposition, Judgment, Statement, and Fact: Speaking about the Written English Used in Logic#712321
- Hyperdoctrine Semantics: An Invitation#74447
- Objects and Attitudes#706622
- The Ontological Commitments of Logical Theories#735863
Record · ID 754465
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive