PhilArchive
open access
Propositions, attitudinal objects, and the distinction between actions and products
This paper argues that attitudinal objects, entities of the sort of John's judgment, John's thought, and John's claim, should play the role of propositions, as the cognitive products of cognitive acts, not the acts themselves.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sentence, Proposition, Judgment, Statement, and Fact: Speaking about the Written English Used in Logic#712321
- Judgment, Extension, Logical Form#723933
- Judgment, Extension, Logical Form#711372
- An introduction to cognitive linguistics#341220
- Propositions, semantic values, and rigidity#89101
Record · ID 754526
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive