PhilArchive
open access
Comparatives and Degrees
I describe a way of handling comparative adjectives "a is P-er than b", in terms of degrees "a has P to degree d". I defend this approach against attacks due to C J F Williams in an article in the same issue of *Analysis*, by tracing his objections to the assumption that degrees must be linearly ordered. Since this abstract is written years later, I can mention that some of the ideas were taken further in my Hypercomparatives. Synthese 111, 1997, 97-114 .
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Constructed and Wild Conceptual Necessities in Contemporary Jurisprudence#766561
- We are Optimizers: Re-opening the Case for Rational Genuine Satisficing#736838
- METHODOLOGY AND SCIENCE FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN JURISPRUDENCE#1178248
- CLASSIFICATION AS A METHOD OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, PARTICULARLY IN JURISPRUDENCE#663197
- The possibility of naturalistic jurisprudence#270139
Record · ID 754848
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive