PhilArchive
open access
Priority, Not Equality, for Possible People
How should we choose between uncertain prospects in which different possible people might exist at different levels of wellbeing? Alex Voorhoeve and Marc Fleurbaey offer an egalitarian answer to this question. I give some reasons to reject their answer and then sketch an alternative, which I call person-affecting prioritarianism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TO MONETIZE OR NOT: INFLUENCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND GENDER IN MONETARY VALUATION OF MEANINGFUL EXPERIENCES#1135387
- TO MONETIZE OR NOT: INFLUENCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND GENDER IN MONETARY VALUATION OF MEANINGFUL EXPERIENCES#1135258
- Measurement scales and welfarist social choice#755075
- Hard Environmental Choices: Comparability, Justification and the Argument from Moral Identity#770084
- Problems of Incommensurability#113532
Record · ID 756430
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive