PhilArchive
open access
The Classification of the Sciences and Cross-disciplinarity
In a world of ever growing specialization, the idea of a unity of science is commonly discarded, but cooperative work involving cross-disciplinary points of view is encouraged. The aim of this paper is to show with some textual support that Charles S. Peirce not only identified this paradoxical situation a century ago, but he also mapped out some paths for reaching a successful solution. A particular attention is paid to Peirce's classification of the sciences and to his conception of science as a collective and cooperative activity of all those whose lives are animated by the desire to discover the truth.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Science as a Form of Life and Cross-disciplinarity: Mariano Artigas and Charles S. Peirce#742218
- Picturing the universe: Adventures with Miura Baien at the borderland of philosophy and science#753138
- A Neurathian Conception of the Unity of Science#761460
- Tabaczek, Mariusz. Emergence. Towards a New Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science#706905
- Peircean realism - towards a scientific metaphysics#95249
Record · ID 757472
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive