PhilArchive
open access
Deductively Sound Formal Proofs
Could the intersection of [formal proofs of mathematical logic] and [sound deductive inference] specify formal systems having [deductively sound formal proofs of mathematical logic]? All that we have to do to provide [deductively sound formal proofs of mathematical logic] is select the subset of conventional [formal proofs of mathematical logic] having true premises and now we have [deductively sound formal proofs of mathematical logic].
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- GPT, the Counterexample Machine#796822
- An Oracle Separating Conjectures about Incompleteness in the Finite Domain#1014427
- Logically Equivalent False Universal Propositions with Different Counterexample Sets#712160
- Formal Verification of Proofs from Automated Theorem Provers for Higher-Order Logic#1051004
- Bayesian Cognitive Science, Unification, and Explanation#738925
Record · ID 757815
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive