PhilArchive
open access
Making Carbon fee just steep enough to meet emission reduction targets
One of the ways that we could account for the unpredictability of the price elasticity of demand for carbon would be to provide a fail-safe mechanism to ensure that we definitely stay on the carbon reduction schedule. If we kept Energy Innovation Act (HR 763) essentially as it is and scale up the annual carbon fee increase by Number-of-Years-Behind-Schedule * 0.15.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Climate change policy and carbon pricing#419786
- Why We Should Support Carbon Prices#87909
- How Is the US Pricing Carbon? How Could We Price Carbon?#643875
- Cutting Emissions, Securing Energy: A Macroeconomic Assessment for COP30#130889
- Report : The Public Economics of Carbon Dioxide Removal / Kai Lessmann, Matthias Kalkuhl#784103
Record · ID 757822
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive