PhilArchive
open access
PHYSICIAN ASSISTED DYING: DEFINING THE ETHICALLY AMBIGUOUS
In states where Physician Assisted Dying (PAD) is legal, physicians occasionally receive requests for this form of end-of-life care. Here, I describe the ethically ambiguous sphere and why PAD falls into it. I argue that, given the ethical ambiguity of PAD, physicians should consider patient autonomy as the highest value in the four principles approach and act as informers and educators.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Preserving Life in an Age of Autonomy: A Critique of Physician-Assisted Suicide#212213
- Until the end of time#117489
- Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide and the Professional Obligations of Physicians#776989
- Physician Aid in Dying: A Humane Option, a Constitutionally Protected Choice#1020157
- Discursive Perspectives on Assisted Dying#367671
Record · ID 757856
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive