PhilArchive
open access
Inferring to the Best Explanation from Uncertain Evidence
This paper presents a new problem for the inference rule commonly known as Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE). The problem is that uncertainty about parts of one’s evidence may undermine the inferrability of a hypothesis that would provide the best explanation of that evidence, especially in cases where there is an alternative hypothesis that would provide a better explanation of only the more certain pieces of evidence. A potential solution to the problem is sketched, in which IBE is generalized to handle uncertain evidence by invoking a notion of evidential robustness.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Inference to the Best Explanation and van Fraassen’s Contextual Theory of Explanation: Reply to Park#761544
- Causal Inference as Inference to the Best Explanation#728559
- Reasoning about Evidence using Bayesian Networks#340967
- Convex Density Constraints for Computing Plausible Counterfactual Explanations#779200
- The Narrow Ontic Counterfactual Account of Distinctively Mathematical Explanation#761508
Record · ID 75890
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive