PhilArchive
open access
Re-viewing the Memory Wars: Some Feminist Philosophical Reflections
An examination of the debates over the so-called 'false' memory syndrome. In this paper, I concur that memory is malleable, but interrogate notions of truth and falsity underlying standards used to evaluate the accuracy of memories of abuse. Such standards divert us, I suggest, from recognizing the truth behind widespread recollections of abuse at the hands of patriarchy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The philosophy of memory today: Editors' introduction#700933
- Custom Freedom and Equality: Mary Astell on marriage and women's education#719657
- Parricidal Autobiographies: Sarah Kofman between Theory and Memory#110401
- Integrity of Memory: ‘Comfort Women’ in Focus: Reflections on the Symposium at Marquette University#713935
- Navigating Epistemic Pushback in Feminist and Critical Race Philosophy Classes#697668
Record · ID 759107
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive