PhilArchive
open access
Selective Realism vs. Individual Realism for Scientific Creativity
Individual realism asserts that our best scientific theories are (approximately) true. In contrast, selective realism asserts that only the stable posits of our best scientific theories are true. Hence, individual realism recommends that we accept more of what our best scientific theories say about the world than selective realism does. The more scientists believe what their theories say about the world, the more they are motivated to exercise their imaginations and think up new theories and experiments. Therefore, individual realism better fosters scientific creativity than selective realism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Intertemporal Choice - Toward an Integrative Framework#485497
- The Unexamined Assumption: How Bell's Theorem Reveals Science's Universal Reliance on Unproven Material Reality#111651
- Rethinking the Drake Equation: Assumptions, Filters, and Temporal Overlap#84671
- Primordial Experiential Realism (PER);體驗實在論-Under revision#17727
- Group Psychology and The Analysis of The Ego#48015
Record · ID 759118
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive