PhilArchive
open access
Cost-Effectiveness in Animal Health: An Ethical Analysis
This chapter evaluates the ethical issues that using cost-effectiveness considerations to set animal health priorities might present, and its conclusions are cautiously optimistic. While using cost-effectiveness calculations in animal health is not without ethical pitfalls, these calculations offer a pathway toward more rigorous priority-setting efforts that allow money spent on animal well-being to do more good. Although assessing quality of life for animals may be more challenging than in humans, implementing prioritization based on cost-effectiveness is less ethically fraught.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Public Preferences about Fairness and the Ethics of Allocating Scarce Medical Interventions#760098
- Avoiding unnecessary suffering: Towards a moral minimum standard for humans' responsibility for animal welfare#90526
- "We Are All Noah: Tom Regan's Olive Branch to Religious Animal Ethics"#738616
- Clinical research: Should patients pay to play?#727481
- 7 U.S.C. § 3191 — Purposes and findings relating to animal health and disease research#560772
Record · ID 759971
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive