PhilArchive
open access
Philosophical reflections on Darwin and evolutionary theory
Few scientists are conscious of the distinc- tion between the logic of what they write and the rhetoric of how they write it. This is because we are taught to write scientific papers and books from a third-person per- spective, using as impersonal (and, almost inevitably, boring [1]) a style as possible. The first chapter in Elliott Sober’s new book examines the difference between Darwin’s logic and his rhetoric in The Origin, and manages to teach some interesting and in- sightful historical and philosophical lessons while doing so.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Ontology of Muhammad Iqbal's Panentheism and Its Relevance to Environmental Ethics#706775
- Nonideal Theory and a Logic of Abduction#82019
- Relational Eco linguistics and Speculative Fabulations#728297
- Sacred Simplicity and Ecological Responsibility: Environmental Ethics in Quakerism#243115
- Andrew Schumann. Logic in Religious Discourse. Ontos, 2010#702234
Record · ID 760788
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive