Skip to main content An official website of the United States government Here's how you know Here's how you know Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Search Log in Dashboard Publications Account settings Log out Search… Search NCBI Primary site navigation Search Logged in as: Dashboard Publications Account settings Log in Search PMC Full-Text Archive Search in PMC Journal List User Guide PERMALINK Copy As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice Foot Ankle Int . 2026 Mar 3;47(4):499–506. doi: 10.1177/10711007251413568 Search in PMC Search in PubMed View in NLM Catalog Add to search Understanding Pain in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Cross-Sectional, CT‑Based Analysis Showing Limited and Inconsistent Associations With Pain Julian J Hollander Julian J Hollander , LLB, BSc 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Programs Sports and Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands 3 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands 4 Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands Find articles by Julian J Hollander 1, 2, 3, 4 , Inger N Sierevelt Inger N Sierevelt , MSc 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 3 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands 5 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xpert Clincs, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 6 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Academie, Haarlem, the Netherlands Find articles by Inger N Sierevelt 1, 3, 5, 6 , Jason A H Steman Jason A H Steman , MD 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Programs Sports and Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands 3 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands 4 Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands Find articles by Jason A H Steman 1, 2, 3, 4 , Juliëtte H M Pijnacker Juliëtte H M Pijnacker , BSc 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Programs Sports and Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands 3 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands 4 Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands Find articles by Juliëtte H M Pijnacker 1, 2, 3, 4 , Kaj S Emanuel Kaj S Emanuel , MSc, PhD 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Programs Sports and Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands 3 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands 4 Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands Find articles by Kaj S Emanuel 1, 2, 3, 4 ; The Amsterdam Ankle Cartilage Team , Gino M M J Kerkhoffs Gino M M J Kerkhoffs , MD, PhD 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Programs Sports and Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands 3 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands 4 Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands Find articles by Gino M M J Kerkhoffs 1, 2, 3, 4 , Sjoerd A S Stufkens Sjoerd A S Stufkens , MD, PhD 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Programs Sports and Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands 3 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands 4 Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands Find articles by Sjoerd A S Stufkens 1, 2, 3, 4, ✉ Author information Article notes Copyright and License information 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Programs Sports and Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands 3 Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands 4 Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands 5 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xpert Clincs, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 6 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Academie, Haarlem, the Netherlands ✉ Sjoerd A. S. Stufkens, MD, PhD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC–Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected] Amsterdam Ankle Cartilage Team: Nathanael O. Agyeman-Prempeh, MD, Noah T. M. van Bergen, BSc, David P. Borensztajn, BSc, Jari Dahmen, BSc, MD, Quinten G. H. Rikken, MD Collection date 2026 Apr. © The Author(s) 2026 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage ). PMC Copyright notice PMCID: PMC13066458 PMID: 41776985 This article has been corrected. See Foot Ankle Int. 2026 Jun 3:10711007261459114 . Abstract Background: Patients with an osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) often present with deep ankle pain, but the direct relationship between structural damage and the perceived pain remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to determine whether pain is associated with demographic and radiologic (computed tomography [CT]-only) lesion characteristics. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with symptomatic OLTs at a tertiary referral academic hospital. The primary outcome was the Pain subscale of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Secondary outcomes included the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain at rest and during walking, as well as the other FAOS subscales. Associations with patient demographics, lesion size, morphology, and location were assessed using univariate linear regression, followed by multivariate linear regression with backward selection. Results: A total of 310 patients were included. In the final multivariate model for the FAOS Pain subscale, higher age (β = −0.18, P = .04) and smoking (β = −8.70, P < .001) were significantly associated with worse pain scores. Lesion morphology characterized by the presence of an osteochondral fragment was associated with lower NRS pain scores during walking. For NRS pain at rest, worse scores were significantly associated with female sex, higher body mass index, smoking, non-primary lesion nature, and greater lesion depth. Conclusion: No association was found between CT-based radiologic lesion characteristics and patient-reported pain as measured by the FAOS Pain subscale. In secondary analyses, some lesion characteristics showed associations, but these were limited and directionally inconsistent. These findings suggest structural damage alone does not seem to fully explain the patient’s pain. Given the CT‑only approach and other design constraints, further research is warranted. Keywords: osteochondral lesion, talus, OLT, lesion characteristics, ankle, pain Graphical Abstract. Open in a new tab This is a visual representation of the abstract. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic. Introduction Patients with an osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) often have a history of trauma, such as ankle sprain, fracture, syndesmotic injury, or chronic lateral ankle instability. 1 - 5 Their symptoms are typically described as deep ankle pain during physical activity, which can substantially impair quality of life by limiting daily function and participation in sports. 6 The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this deep ankle pain remain poorly understood. Several hypotheses have been proposed, most notably the involvement of nerve endings within the subchondral bone. 7 Another theory suggests that increased intra-articular synovial fluid pressure infiltrates and stimulates these nerve fibers, thereby contributing to pain. 8 From this perspective, radiologic lesion characteristics—such as size, morphology, and location—may be expected to influence pain severity. For example, lesion location could alter synovial fluid dynamics, whereas larger lesions may involve more subchondral bone and generate increased nociceptive input. Nevertheless, pain perception is inherently multifactorial, influenced not only by biological but also by psychological and social factor. 9 , 10 A comprehensive biopsychosocial framework is therefore needed to understand the pain experience in OLT patients. If it would be possible to predict pain in OLT patients, this would allow for more targeted treatment decisions and potentially reduce the need for invasive procedures. Accordingly, the primary aim of this study was to investigate whether demographic and radiologic lesion characteristics are associated with pain, as measured by the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) Pain subscale. Secondary analyses explored associations between lesion characteristics and the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain at rest and during walking, as well as the other FAOS subscales. It was hypothesized that there is a small association between pain and radiologic computed tomography (CT) characteristics. Materials and Methods Study Design The present study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data and was conducted at an academic tertiary referral center in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (reference number: W14_237#14.17.0288) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patient Selection All patients who presented to the Orthopaedic Department of the Amsterdam UMC between January 2017 and October 2024 for treatment of a symptomatic osteochondral lesion of the talus were prospectively included. Patients with concomitant conditions that could affect pain reporting—such as rheumatoid arthritis, advanced osteoporosis, malignancy, or infection—were excluded. Further exclusion criteria were incomplete baseline data (eg, missing clinical characteristics or absence of a baseline computed tomography [CT] scan). Patients who underwent multiple treatments were included for the first presentation in order to ensure independence of observations. To avoid potential confounding from contralateral disease, patients with bilateral symptomatic lesions who received treatment for both ankles were excluded. Data Extraction All demographic characteristics were extracted using the electronic data capture system CASTOR by a single researcher. Radiologic variables were independently assessed by 2 researchers. For continuous variables, such as lesion size, the average of the 2 raters was used in the analysis. In the case of disagreement regarding categorical radiologic variables (eg, lesion location and morphology), consensus was sought between 2 reviewers JH and JS. If consensus could not be reached, the senior author GK or SS served as the final arbiter. Patient Demographics Patient demographics included patient sex, age at baseline (ie, prior to treatment), body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and lesion nature (primary or non-primary; ie [no] surgical treatment in patient history). Smoking status was classified as a binary variable (smoker vs non-smoker), based on the methodology used in other studies assessing this variable specifically. 11 - 13 Radiologic Characteristics All radiologic variables were extracted from computed tomography (CT) scans prior to the start of treatment. Osteochondral lesion size was measured using the greatest diameter (in mm) anteroposterior (AP), mediolateral (ML) and the depth. Using these measurements, the lesion surface area was calculated using an ellipsoid formula (0.79 × ML × AP; mm 2 ) and lesion volume was also calculated (AP × ML × depth; mm 3 ). 14 Interobserver reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis ( Supplementary Materials ). Lesion location was determined using a 9-grid scheme and subsequently classified in being medial, central, or lateral ( Figure 1 ). 15 , 16 This categorization was done in order to increase power and interpretability. Lesion morphology was categorically defined as fragmented, crater-like, or cystic. 17 In case of mixed location and morphology, the extracting researcher was instructed to choose the category that included the biggest part of the lesion. Figure 1. Open in a new tab Anatomic zones. Outcome Measures All patients received (electronic) questionnaires containing the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score with its 5 subscales (higher score = better) and the NRS of pain (lower score = better) during walking and during rest directly after their first visit at the outpatient clinic, before starting treatment. 18 - 20 Statistical Analysis All data analyses were performed using custom-made Python scripts (version 3.11.8) with the packages Scikit-learn, Scipy, and Statsmodels. 21 - 24 Dichotomous and categorical variables are presented as absolute numbers with corresponding percentages. Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as means with SDs; otherwise the median and IQR are reported. Normality was assessed by means of visual inspection of box plots and with the Shapiro-Wilk test. To identify factors that were associated with the primary outcome (ie, the FAOS pain subscale), univariate linear regression for all lesion variables (lesion nature, lesion size dimensions [ie, AP, ML, and depth], lesion morphology, lesion location) was performed. Lesion surface area and volume were not used due to covariance. Additionally, patient characteristics that have been reported to influence treatment outcomes in the literature (sex, 25 age at treatment, 26 BMI, 27 and smoking status 11 ) were included. Variables that were significantly associated (adjusted significance level of 0.2) in the univariate linear regression were included in a multivariate linear regression analysis. Backwards selection was applied. For the primary outcome (FAOS pain subscale), model diagnostics using residual plots, Q-Q plots, and variance inflation factor (VIF) are provided in the Supplementary Materials for each imputed model (n = 20). A P <.05 was determined to be significant in the final model. The same methodology was used for all secondary outcomes (ie, NRS of pain during walking, NRS of pain during rest and other FAOS subscales). Multiple imputation using all model variables and 2 auxiliary variables (length and weight) was performed for missing data (BMI for 10 patients [3%] and smoking for 7 patients [2%]), assuming that the data were missing at random. Twenty data sets were created, and results were pooled using the Rubin rules. 28 Additionally, a complete-case sensitivity analysis was performed ( Supplementary Materials ). Results Patient Selection and Characteristics A total of 310 patients were included in the present study ( Figure 2 ). The mean age of the patients was 32.2 years (SD 12.2) and 174 patients (56%) were male. All demographic and radiologic characteristics are outlined in Table 1 . Figure 2. Open in a new tab Patient selection flowchart with reason of exclusion. Table 1. Patient- and lesion characteristics. Patient characteristics Age, y, mean ± SD 32.2 ± 12.2 Sex, male/female, n (%) 174 (56) / 136 (44) BMI a , mean ± SD 25.8 ± 4.4 Laterality, right/left, n (%) 169 (55) / 141 (45) Smoking, yes/no b , n (%) 82 (27) / 221 (73) Lesion characteristics Nature, primary/non-primary, n (%) 179 (58) / 131 (42) Lesion size AP, mm, mean ± SD 14.9 ± 5.2 ML, mm, mean ± SD 10.0 ± 3.6 Depth, mm, mean ± SD 7.8 ± 4.2 Surface area, mm 2 , median (IQR) 113 (74-166) Volume, mm 3 , median (IQR) 896 (501-1830) Lesion location, n (%) Medial 225 (73) Central 14 (5) Lateral 71 (23) Lesion morphology, n (%) Crater 106 (34) Cystic 156 (50) Fragment 48 (15) Open in a new tab Abbreviations: AP, anteroposterior; BMI, body mass index; ML, mediolateral. a Missing for 10 patients. b Missing for 7 patients. Outcomes Primary outcome The FAOS pain subscale was at baseline 56.8 (SD: 17.9). Univariate analysis showed a P value < .2 for age at surgery, BMI, smoking, and lesion nature. Multivariate analysis and the final model identified age at years ( P = .048) and smoking ( P = .0018) as predictors ( Table 2 ). Both were negatively associated with the FAOS Pain (ie, higher age or positive smoking status associated with a worse score). Table 2. Linear Regression Analysis for FAOS Pain Subscale (Higher Score Means Less Pain). Univariate Multivariate Final Multivariate Model Variable β (95% CI) P Value a β (95% CI) P Value a β (95% CI) P Value a Sex, male 1.92 (−2.09 to 5.94) .35 Age at treatment, y −0.15 (−0.31 to 0.01) .07 −0.13 (−0.32 to 0.05) .15 −0.17 (−0.34 to 0.00) .048 BMI −0.38 (−0.84 –0.07) .10 −0.22 (−0.73 to 0.29) .37 Smoking, yes −7.91 (−12.38 to −3.44) <.001 −8.43 (−13.21 to −3.66) .0016 −8.25 (−13.01 to −3.49) .0018 Lesion nature, non-primary −3.09 (−7.12 to 0.93) .13 −3.53 (−7.76 to 0.70) .10 Lesion size AP, mm 0.04 (−0.35 to 0.43) .84 ML, mm −0.14 (−0.70 to 0.42) .62 depth, mm −0.21 (−0.68 to 0.26) .38 Lesion morphology (reference: crater) Cystic −0.37 (−4.36 to 3.62) .86 Fragmentary 3.03 (−2.46 to 8.54) .28 Lesion location (reference: central) Lateral 1.39 (−3.35 to 6.13) .57 Medial −0.10 (−4.57 to 4.37) .97 Open in a new tab Abbreviations: AP, anteroposterior; BMI, body mass index; FAOS, foot and ankle outcome score; ML, mediolateral. a Boldface indicates statistical significance. The complete-case sensitivity analysis confirmed a robust analysis as comparable results in univariate analysis and the same final model were seen ( Supplementary Materials ) with an R 2 of 0.055 and adjusted R 2 of 0.048. Model diagnostic figures for all imputed data sets are available in the Supplementary Materials . No relevant violations of regression assumptions were observed, and the results were consistent across imputations. Thereby, the robustness of the final multivariate model is supported. Secondary outcomes The analysis for the secondary outcome NRS during walking found a significant association for the variable fragmentary morphology (β = −1.14, P = .01). For the NRS, during rest the variables sex (β = −0.69, P = .02), BMI (β = 0.07, P = .03), smoking (β = 0.69, P = .03), and lesion nature (β = 0.84, P = .005) as well as lesion size depth (β = 0.08, P = .02) were of importance ( Table 3 ). These models had an R ² of respectively 0.024 (adjusted 0.018) and 0.104 (adjusted 0.089) on the complete-case sensitivity analysis. Table 3. Linear Regression Analysis for NRS During Walking and NRS During Rest (Higher Score Means More Pain). Variable NRS During Walking NRS During Rest Univariate Multivariate Final Multivariate Model Univariate Multivariate Final Multivariate Model β (95% CI) P Value a β (95% CI) P Value a β (95% CI) P Value a β (95% CI) P Value a β (95% CI) P Value a β (95% CI) P Value a Sex, male −0.38 (−0.931 to 0.169) .17 −0.46 (−1.06 to 0.14) .12 −0.57 (−1.1 to −0.042) .03 −0.70 (−1.26 to −0.13) .02 −0.69 (−1.25 to −0.13) .02 Age at treatment, y 0.02 (0.004 to 0.049) .02 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.04) .38 0.012 (−0.010 to 0.033) .28 BMI 0.07 (−0.006 to 0.130) .03 0.04 (−0.04 to 0.11) .31 0.08 (0.019 to 0.138) .01 0.06 (−0.01 to 0.12) .08 0.07 (0.01 to 0.13) .03 Smoking, yes 0.26 (−0.355 to 0.884) .40 0.58 (−0.015 to 1.177) .06 0.73 (0.11 to 1.35) .02 0.69 (0.07 to 1.31) .03 Lesion nature, non-primary 0.68 (0.133 to 1.230) .01 0.46 (−0.15 to 1.06) .13 0.80 (0.272 to 1.324) .003 0.69 (0.12 to 1.26) .02 0.84 (0.29 to 1.39) .005 Lesion size AP (mm) 0.01 (−0.045 to 0.061) .78 0.02 (−0.030 to 0.072) .43 ML (mm) 0.05 (−0.031 to 0.123) .24 0.03 (−0.041 to 0.107) .38 Depth (mm) 0.06 (−0.009 to 0.120) .09 0.07 (−0.01 to 0.14) .08 0.06 (−0.003 to 0.121) .06 0.10 (0.02 to 0.17) .01 0.08 (0.01 to 0.14) .02 Lesion morphology (reference: crater) Cystic 0.14 (−0.402 to 0.692) .60 −0.31 (−1.03 to 0.41) .38 −0.21 (−0.85 to 0.43) .50 −0.15 (−0.682 to 0.373) .57 −0.56 (−1.23 to 0.11) .10 Fragmentary −1.01 (−1.761 to −0.265) .008 −0.76 (−1.69 to 0.17) .10 −1.14 (−2.02 to −0.25) .01 −0.61 (−1.336 to 0.115) .10 −0.65 (−1.52 to 0.23) .14 Lesion location (reference: central) Lateral −0.97 (−1.607 to −0.323) .003 −0.82 (−2.31 to 0.67) .26 −0.68 (−1.302 to −0.056) .03 −0.38 (−1.80 to 1.03) .58 Medial 0.75 (0.137 to 1.352) .016 −0.29 (−1.68 to 1.10) .66 0.52 (−0.073 to 1.104) .09 −0.13 (−1.45 to 1.18) .84 Open in a new tab Abbreviations: AP, anteroposterior; BMI, body mass index; ML, mediolateral; NRS, numeric rating scale. a Boldface indicates statistical significance. The analysis of the other FAOS subscales is available in the Supplementary Materials . In the final models of these subscales, different predictors were identified per subscale: smoking and lesion nature for symptoms, age and smoking for ADL, age and lesion morphology for sports, and mediolateral lesion size and lesion morphology for the QoL subscale. Discussion Main Findings and Interpretation The main finding of the present study is that the primary analysis did not identify associations between CT-derived radiologic lesion characteristics and pain, while in some secondary outcomes significant relationships were found. These findings indicate that the relationship between lesion characteristics is highly complex. For the primary outcome, the FAOS Pain subscale, worse pain scores were associated with higher age and smoking. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the relationship between baseline patient and lesion characteristics and pain severity, measured primarily by the FAOS Pain subscale and secondarily by the NRS. An editorial by van Dijk et al. 7 hypothesized that pain in OLTs results from repeated elevations in synovial fluid pressure stimulating the innervated subchondral bone plate, with cartilage itself playing no direct role. Based on this theory, lesion depth and cystic morphology were expected to be important contributors. However, in our study, lesion depth was only associated with pain at rest—an unexpected finding, given that synovial fluid pressure is presumed lower at rest than during activity. Smoking emerged as a modifiable risk factor: smokers reporting higher pain levels. 29 Although the observed difference of 8.7 points does not exceed the minimal important change, 30 the biological plausibility is strong. Smoking induces low-grade inflammation, 31 , 32 is associated with impaired vascularization and delayed healing, 33 , 34 and often clusters with psychosocial and behavioral risk factors. 35 Together, these may contribute to heightened pain perception. In one sub-analysis, a modest association was found between lesion depth and NRS pain during rest. As this association was only found in this model, with a low explained variance, caution is needed when interpretating this. Moreover, pain during rest is not typical for OLTs, which typically cause deep ankle pain during activity/weightbearing. In the sub-analysis for NRS during walking, fragmentary morphology showed to be associated with a lower score (ie, less pain). No clear reason could be identified for this intriguing finding. However, as these findings are not consistent across the different scores, they should be considered as hypothesis-generating and needs further research in the future. The lack of a consistent association between radiologic lesion characteristics and pain supports the notion that pain in OLTs is driven by more than structural damage alone. Psychosocial and systemic influences likely play a role. 9 This aligns with the frequent occurrence of asymptomatic OLTs and the underestimation of their prevalence. 5 These findings highlight the potential value of a multidisciplinary approach to pain management. Future research should further explore systemic contributors—including metabolic health, inflammatory markers, and psychosocial domains—and investigate whether advanced imaging techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or 3D volumetric segmentation, can detect more subtle structural correlates of pain. Strengths and Limitations This study has limitations. The explained variance of the multivariate models was relatively low, indicating that other unmeasured factors influence pain perception in OLT patients. Consequently, the models are not suitable for clinical prediction. Another limitation is that this study was CT-based and did not include MRI variables. Therefore, MRI-derived variables such as bone marrow edema and soft tissue changes were not assessed in the present study. However, CT is widely used and provides a more adequate view on the structural changes in the subchondral bone. Future studies using MRI could be conducted to analyze the relationship between MRI findings (eg, bone marrow edema, effusion, synovitis) and pain in OLTs. In this respect, it should also be mentioned that multiple potential confounders (eg, symptom duration, analgesic use, and psychological factors) could not be assessed as there is a limit of variables that can be included with sufficient power. Furthermore, treatment outcomes were not assessed in relation to baseline characteristics. Future longitudinal studies should investigate whether modifiable factors affect both pain and treatment response. Lastly, the present study used a cohort from a tertiary referral center. Therefore, the results might not be generalizable to other centers and clinical application is not feasible yet. Strengths include the large sample size (318 patients), the robustness of a complete-case sensitivity analysis, and the independent evaluation of CT scans by 2 researchers, ensuring high-quality radiologic assessment. Clinical Relevance These findings emphasize that radiographic lesion characteristics do not reflect pain severity in OLT patients. Clinical assessment should therefore avoid tunnel vision and adopt a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach. Conclusion No association was found between CT-based radiologic lesion characteristics and patient-reported pain as measured by the FAOS Pain subscale. Therefore, structural damage alone does not seem to fully explain the patient’s pain, reinforcing the orthopaedic adage: treat the patient, not the scan . Importantly, the present study has limitations and therefore further research is needed. Supplemental Material sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007251413568 – Supplemental material for Understanding Pain in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Cross-Sectional, CT‑Based Analysis Showing Limited and Inconsistent Associations With Pain sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007251413568.pdf (1.7MB, pdf) Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007251413568 for Understanding Pain in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Cross-Sectional, CT‑Based Analysis Showing Limited and Inconsistent Associations With Pain by Julian J. Hollander, Inger N. Sierevelt, Jason A. H. Steman, Juliëtte H. M. Pijnacker, Kaj S. Emanuel, Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs and Sjoerd A. S. Stufkens in Foot & Ankle International Footnotes Author Note: All work for the present study was performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. ORCID iDs: Julian J. Hollander, LLB, BSc, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8345-1648 Inger N. Sierevelt, MSc, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0924-9358 Juliëtte H. M. Pijnacker, BSc, https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7146-3478 Sjoerd A. S. Stufkens, MD, PhD, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1287-1826 Ethical Considerations: Ethical approval was received from the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam (number: W14_237#14.17.0288). Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Disclosure forms for all authors are available online. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from every patient prior to enrolment to the present study. Supplemental Material: Supplementary material is available online with this article. Contributor Information The Amsterdam Ankle Cartilage Team: Nathanael O. Agyeman-Prempeh , Noah T. M. van Bergen , David P. Borensztajn , Jari Dahmen , and Quinten G. H. Rikken References 1. Wijnhoud EJ, Rikken QGH, Dahmen J, Sierevelt IN, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs G. One in three patients with chronic lateral ankle instability has a cartilage lesion. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(7):1943-1951. doi: 10.1177/03635465221084365 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 2. Dahmen J, Jaddi S, Hagemeijer NC, et al. Incidence of (Osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in isolated syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cartilage. 2022;13(2):19476035221102569. doi: 10.1177/19476035221102569 [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 3. Hintermann B, Regazzoni P, Lampert C, Stutz G, Gächter A. Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(3):345-351. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b3.10064 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 4. Martijn HA, Lambers KTA, Dahmen J, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs G. High incidence of (osteo)chondral lesions in ankle fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(5):1523-1534. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06187-y [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 5. Dahmen J, Karlsson J, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. The ankle cartilage cascade: incremental cartilage damage in the ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3503-3507. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06755-w [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 6. D’Ambrosi R, Maccario C, Serra N, Ursino C, Usuelli FG. Relationship between symptomatic osteochondral lesions of the talus and quality of life, body mass index, age, size and anatomic location. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24(4):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.04.011 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 7. van Dijk CN, Reilingh ML, Zengerink M, van Bergen CJ. Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(5):570-580. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1064-x [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 8. Mach DB, Rogers SD, Sabino MC, et al. Origins of skeletal pain: sensory and sympathetic innervation of the mouse femur. Neuroscience. 2002;113(1):155-166. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00165-3 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 9. Cotchett M, Frescos N, Whittaker GA, Bonanno DR. Psychological factors associated with foot and ankle pain: a mixed methods systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2022;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00506-3 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 10. Meints SM, Edwards RR. Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;87(Pt B):168–182. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 11. Cheng X, Su T, Li J, et al. Effect of cigarette smoking on postoperative outcomes after arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int. 2024;45(8):862-869. doi: 10.1177/10711007241250007 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 12. Lee G-W, Lee M-S, Kim J-E, Lee K-B. The effect of smoking on the outcomes of arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus. PLoS One. 2025;20(4):e0321894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321894 [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 13. Pehlivanoglu G, Yildiz KI, Albayrak K, Aykut US, Kurk MB, Gurbuz S. Smoking is associated with inferior postoperative outcomes after autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: a minimum 5-year clinical follow-up study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20(1):992. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06428-1 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 14. Choi WJ, Park KK, Kim BS, Lee JW. Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome? Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1974-1980. doi: 10.1177/0363546509335765 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 15. Raikin SM, Elias I, Zoga AC, Morrison WB, Besser MP, Schweitzer ME. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: localization and morphologic data from 424 patients using a novel anatomical grid scheme. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(2):154-161. doi: 10.3113/fai.2007.0154 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 16. Martin KD, McBride TJ, Horan DP, et al. Validation of 9-grid scheme for localizing osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020;5(3):2473011420944925. doi: 10.1177/2473011420944925 [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ] 17. Rikken QGH, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: an individualized treatment paradigm from the amsterdam perspective. Foot Ankle Clin. 2021;26(1):121-136. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2020.10.002 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 18. Sierevelt IN, van Eekeren ICM, Haverkamp D, Reilingh ML, Terwee CB, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Evaluation of the dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): responsiveness and minimally important change. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1339-1347. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3941-9 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 19. Sierevelt IN, Beimers L, van Bergen CJA, Haverkamp D, Terwee CB, Kerkhoffs G. Validation of the dutch language version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(8):2413-2419. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3017-2 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 20. Azam MT, Yu K, Butler J, et al. Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) for osteochondral lesions of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2023;44(8):745-753. doi: 10.1177/10711007231174198 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 21. Van Rossum G, Drake FL. Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace; 2009. [ Google Scholar ] 22. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python. Nat Methods. 2020;17(3):261–272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 23. Seabold S, Perktold J. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with python. Paper presented at: 9th Python in Science Conference, Austin, TX, June 28-July 3, 2010. SciPy. [ Google Scholar ] 24. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825-2830. [ Google Scholar ] 25. Gianakos AL, Okedele O, Mulcahey MK, Kerkhoffs GM, Kennedy JG. Autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus-does sex play a role? J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023;62(1):96-101. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.005 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 26. Cao S, Ding N, Zan Q, et al. Autologous osteoperiosteal transplantation is effective in the treatment of single cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus and the prognostic impact of age should be emphasized. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024;32(11):2874-2884. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12301 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 27. Dahmen J, Rikken Q, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Talar osteoperiostic grafting from the iliac crest (TOPIC): two-year prospective results of a novel press-fit surgical technique for large, complex osteochondral lesions of the medial talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023;105(17):1318-1328. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.22.01322 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 28. Pedersen AB, Mikkelsen EM, Cronin-Fenton D, et al. Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:157-166. doi: 10.2147/clep.S129785 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 29. Khan JS, Hah JM, Mackey SC. Effects of smoking on patients with chronic pain: a propensity-weighted analysis on the collaborative health outcomes information registry. Pain. 2019;160(10):2374-2379. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001631 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 30. Sierevelt IN, van Kampen PM, Terwee CB, et al. The minimal important change is not a universal fixed value across diagnoses when using the FAOS and FAAM in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024;32(9):2406-2419. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12308 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 31. Elisia I, Lam V, Cho B, et al. The effect of smoking on chronic inflammation, immune function and blood cell composition. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76556-7 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 32. Aldaham S, Foote JA, Chow HH, Hakim IA. Smoking status effect on inflammatory markers in a randomized trial of current and former heavy smokers. Int J Inflam. 2015;2015:439396. doi: 10.1155/2015/439396 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 33. Sørensen LT, Jørgensen S, Petersen LJ, et al. Acute effects of nicotine and smoking on blood flow, tissue oxygen, and aerobe metabolism of the skin and subcutis. J Surg Res. 2009;152(2):224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.02.066 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 34. Porter SE, Hanley EN., Jr. The musculoskeletal effects of smoking. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9(1):9-17. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200101000-00002 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] 35. Harwood GA, Salsberry P, Ferketich AK, Wewers ME. Cigarette smoking, socioeconomic status, and psychosocial factors: examining a conceptual framework. Public Health Nurs. 2007;24(4):361-371. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00645.x [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] Associated Data This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article. Supplementary Materials sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007251413568 – Supplemental material for Understanding Pain in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Cross-Sectional, CT‑Based Analysis Showing Limited and Inconsistent Associations With Pain sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007251413568.pdf (1.7MB, pdf) Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007251413568 for Understanding Pain in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Cross-Sectional, CT‑Based Analysis Showing Limited and Inconsistent Associations With Pain by Julian J. Hollander, Inger N. Sierevelt, Jason A. H. Steman, Juliëtte H. M. Pijnacker, Kaj S. Emanuel, Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs and Sjoerd A. S. Stufkens in Foot & Ankle International Articles from Foot & Ankle International are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications ACTIONS View on publisher site PDF (717.6 KB) Cite Collections Permalink PERMALINK Copy RESOURCES Similar articles Cited by other articles Links to NCBI Databases Cite Copy Download .nbib .nbib Format: AMA APA MLA NLM Add to Collections Create a new collection Add to an existing collection Name your collection * Choose a collection Unable to load your collection due to an error Please try again Add Cancel Follow NCBI NCBI on X (formerly known as Twitter) NCBI on Facebook NCBI on LinkedIn NCBI on GitHub NCBI RSS feed Connect with NLM NLM on X (formerly known as Twitter) NLM on Facebook NLM on YouTube National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894 Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure Help Accessibility Careers NLM NIH HHS USA.gov Back to Top