PhilArchive
open access
Why God Thinks what He is Thinking? An Argument against Samuel Newlands’ Brute–Fact–Theory of Divine Ideas in Leibniz’s Metaphysics
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Imagination and Harmony in Leibniz's Philosophy of Language#757883
- Gödel's incompleteness theorems, free will and mathematical thought#732959
- Discourse on Metaphysics#771348
- Why Leibniz Should Have Agreed with Berkeley about Abstract Ideas#761982
- Hesperus and Phosphorus: Sense, Pretense, and Reference#712938
Record · ID 761847
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive