PhilArchive
open access
We ought to rethink our notion of human rights
Since the era of modern philosophy, we have always assumed as though rights, as they are primarily based upon natural law, are natural inalienable rights. For the longest time this has worked out well for the protection of our natural necessities to life, liberty, and property. In the Filipino experience, however, the biggest human rights violation is the everyday denial of such rights. When human rights are in fact, propertied and is based upon class-biases, we ought to rethink whether human rights are truly inalienable.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Human Rights, An Overview#773688
- Human Rights and Natural Law: An Intercultural Philosophical Perspective#713458
- Some socio-legal and legal philosophical implications of limited universal holism with special considerations of modern human rights#708911
- INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS, CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES, AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT#137318
- Unpacking the Ambiguities in Republic Act No. 11479 or the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 of the Philippines#391802
Record · ID 762091
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive