PhilArchive
open access
Harm
In recent years, philosophers have proposed a variety of accounts of the nature of harm. In this paper, I consider several of these accounts and argue that they are unsuccessful. I then make a modest case for a different view.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Defending the Tragic Realm: Seven Objections to Hardened Moral Separatism#99850
- The question‐centered account of harm and benefit#106948
- Criminalizing Ecocide: An Opportunity to Embed the Inseparability of Humans from Nature Into the Law#168668
- In Defence of Macroidealism#88617
- ‘Frail worms of the earth’: philosophical reflections on the meaning of life#111560
Record · ID 762188
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive