PhilArchive
open access
Advocacy and Genuine Autonomy: The Lawyer's Role When the Client Has a Right to Do Wrong
Stephen L. Pepper argues that lawyers and clients often act together in ways that their moral convictions would prevent them from acting individually. In an attempt to address this problem, I explore the nature of the attorney's responsibility to help her client reach autonomous decisions. To do this, I review the work of some prominent medical ethicists on a parallel to Pepper's problem in doctor-patient relationships.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Virtue and Advice: Socratic Perspectives on Lawyer Independence and Moral Counseling of Clients#1021660
- Patients, Corporate Attorneys, and Moral Obligations#724596
- From "Moral Stupidity" to Professional Responsibility#494577
- Prevailing Cases of Lawyers' Liability in The Conduct of Cases a Case for Prefessional Indemnity#1042678
- Professional Identity Formation Through Therapeutic Jurisprudence#1177798
Record · ID 762217
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive