PhilArchive
open access
Harming Yourself and Others: A Note on the Asymmetry of Agency in Action Evaluations
Principles are investigated that allow one to establish a preference ordering between possible actions based on the question of whether the acting agent himself or other agents will benefit or be harmed by the consequences of an action. It is shown that a combination of utility maximization, an altruist principle, and weak negative utilitarianism yields an ordering that seems to be intuitively appealing, although it does not necessarily reflect common everyday evaluations of actions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The priority view#752126
- Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect: 'Theory of mind' and moral judgment#745620
- Right Action as Loss-Minimization Among Viable Options: A Structural Theory#704804
- Negative Freedom or Objective Good: A Recurring Dilemma in the Foundations of Politics#760633
- Moral Uncertainty, Pure Justifiers, and Agent-Centred Options#693650
Record · ID 762549
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive