PhilArchive
open access
A pragmatic meta-conception of validity for diagnostic concepts in psychiatry: a step prior to utility, theories and methods of validation
Dear Editor, in a previous paper we have tried to delve into what validity means in the context of psychiatric nosology, arguing for a pragmatic view of it. Here we want to briefly reassert the basic points of our analysis, make a few clarifications and address some issues raised by commentators.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Protocol Update: The Normative Modelling Paradigm for Computational Psychiatry#314146
- Italian Validation of the Revised MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale#1047108
- Diagnosis provision by young people's mental health services: a comparison with epidemiological data#339599
- The body language: a semiotic reading of Szasz’ Anti-psychiatry#747919
- Disposition: the “pathic” dimension of existence and its relevance in affective disorders and schizophrenia#110793
Record · ID 763596
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive