PhilArchive
open access
What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman–Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Type I error rates are not usually inflated#716345
- Irreproducible research and a typology of replication efforts#311592
- An evaluation of four solutions to the forking paths problem: Adjusted alpha, preregistration, sensitivity analyses, and abandoning the Neyman-Pearson approach#764328
- A Note on Inferential Decisions, Errors and Path-Dependency#1110100
- The Doxastic Ratchet: Asymmetric Belief Revision and Experiential Entrenchment#695309
Record · ID 764381
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive