PhilArchive
open access
Taking Reductionism to the Limit: How to Rebut the Antireductionist Argument from Infinite Limits
This paper analyses the anti-reductionist argument from renormalisation group explanations of universality, and shows how it can be rebutted if one assumes that the explanation in question is captured by the counterfactual dependence account of explanation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Counterfactuals, counteractuals, and free choice#747072
- Indistinguishability Right from the Start in Standard Quantum Mechanics#91393
- Total Obtainment#695187
- Quantum Freezing and Discrete Becoming: Zeno Effect, Causal Sets, and Quantum Gravity#102268
- Counterfactual Triviality: A Lewis-Impossibility Argument for Counterfactuals#777179
Record · ID 764685
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive