PhilArchive
open access
Is Justification Necessary for Knowledge?
Justification has long been considered a necessary condition for knowledge, and theories that deny the necessity of justification have been dismissed as nonstarters. In this chapter, we challenge this long-standing view by showing that many of the arguments offered in support of it fall short and by providing empirical evidence that individuals are often willing to attribute knowledge when epistemic justification is lacking.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Strength of Justification – The Rational Degree of Certainty Approach#749777
- Justification and Inquiry: Resolving the Easy Knowledge Problem#732569
- Enticing Epistemic Reasons#692846
- Personal and Doxastic Variants of Epistemic Justification and Their Roles in the Theory of Knowledge#727572
- Why Pragmatism Cannot Save Us: An Expansion of the Epistemic Regress Problem#75805
Record · ID 764706
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive