PhilArchive
open access
Minimalizacja cierpienia zwierząt a wegetarianizm
The article is a reductio ad absurdum of assumptions which are shared by a large number of followers of the animal welfare movement and utilitarianism. I argue that even if we accept the main ethical arguments for a negative moral assessment of eating meat we should not promote vegetarianism but rather beefism (eating only meat from beef cattle). I also argue that some forms of vegetarianism, i.e. ichtivegetarianism, can be much more morally worse than normal meat diet. In order to justify these thesis I show that there are significant moral differences in the consumption of animal products from different species.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- _Food for Thought: The Debate over Eating Meat_ Edited by Steve F. Sapontzis#98675
- Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism, Part 3#741090
- The Immorality of Eating Meat#727586
- Dane badawcze projektu "Topos „wmurowanej kobiety” w kulturach Europy Południowo-Wschodniej i Węgier"#1067647
- Folgt Aus Dem Unwert der Tierhaltung Ein Verbot Des Fleischkonsums?#735945
Record · ID 764807
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive