PhilArchive
open access
Semantic Deference versus Semantic Coordination
It's widely accepted that social facts about an individual's linguistic community can affect both the reference of her words and the concepts those words express. Theorists sympathetic to the internalist tradition have sought to accommodate these social dependence phenomena without altering their core theoretical commitments by positing deferential reference-fixing criteria. In this paper, we sketch a different explanation of social dependence phenomena, according to which all concepts are individuated in part by causal-historical relations linking token elements of thought.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Philosophical and Linguistic Intuitions and the Core-Periphery Distinction#86426
- Cognition and Recognition#101901
- The Complex Nature of Language, THE MISCOMMUNICATION TRILOGY, “The Entropy of Communication, Vol. II”, Part 24#240812
- The limits of selflessness: semantic relativism and the epistemology of de se thoughts#738265
- On Self-Manifestation · Form Chapter 9 v1.0: Dissolution of Mis-Externalization — Why “Internal” and “External” Are Only Generated Labels#73339
Record · ID 766340
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive