PhilArchive
open access
The Epistemology of Modest Atheism
Distinguishing between the old atheism, the new atheism, and modest atheism, and also between belief and acceptance, and belief and acceptance tokens and types, I defend the disjunctive view that either modest atheistic belief or modest atheistic acceptance, construed as type, is today epistemically justified in the context of philosophical inquiry. Central to my defence is a deductive version of the hiddenness argument and an emphasis on the early stage of philosophical inquiry that we presently occupy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Akratic (epistemic) modesty#710877
- Be modest: you're living on the edge#720811
- Divine hiddenness or de jure objections to theism: You cannot have both#739627
- Against the Epistemic Nobility of Flat-Out Belief: Elizabeth Jackson, Credence, Faith, and the Abandonment of Calibration#692787
- Schleiermacher, Realism, and Epistemic Modesty: A Reply to my Critics#751402
Record · ID 766408
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive