PhilArchive
open access
What If Bizet and Verdi Had Been Compatriots?
Stalnaker argued that conditional excluded middle should be included in the principles that govern counterfactuals on the basis that intuitions support that principle. This is because there are pairs of competing counterfactuals that appear to be equally acceptable. In doing so, he was forced to introduced semantic vagueness into his system of counterfactuals. In this paper it is argued that there is a simpler and purely epistemic explanation of these cases that avoids the need for introducing semantic vagueness into the semantics for counterfactuals.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Solving a Paradox of Evidential Equivalence#720892
- Conditional backshift and counterfactual illusion: Tense probability and epistemic stance in backshifted English conditional constructions#687841
- Indicative conditionals without iterative epistemology#740421
- Don't Believe the Hype: Why Should Philosophical Theories Yield to Intuitions?#754204
- "It Was Meant to Be:” Retrospective Meaning Construction through Mental Simulation#105875
Record · ID 767487
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive