PhilArchive
open access
Frege's Unthinkable Thoughts
There are two common reactions to Frege’s claim that some senses and thoughts are private. Privatists accept both private senses and thoughts, while intersubjectivists don’t accept either. Both sides agree on a pair of tacit assumptions: first, that private senses automatically give rise to private thoughts; and second, that private senses and thoughts are the most problematic entities to which Frege’s remarks on privacy give rise. The aim of this paper is to show that both assumptions are mistaken. This will motivate a so far neglected, reconciliatory position between privatism and intersubjectivism according to which all thoughts are public while some senses are private.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Euthyphro Dilemma for Higher-order Theories of Consciousness#771072
- Les limites de la lecture externaliste du meinen wittgensteinien : Une « intentionnalité » grammaticale#73399
- Thoughts about Thoughts: The Structure of Fregean Propositions#722877
- Frege's Influence on Wittgenstein: Reversing Metaphysics via the Context Principle#762706
- Frege on the Tolerability of Sense Variation: A Reply to Michaelson and Textor#82409
Record · ID 768541
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive