PhilArchive
open access
On the need for a right to cognitive privacy
This paper argues that legal privacy should be afforded to the content of the mind, comparing cognitive privacy to other protected forms of privacy and briefly addressing the potential pitfalls of compulsory neuroimaging.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cognitive privacy and brain data protection: responsibilities of university teaching staff#287647
- Privacy at the Limits of Control#74664
- Brain Data in Context: Are New Rights the Way to Mental and Brain Privacy?#17800
- The theoretical and legal foundations of privacy in the public sphere#1177513
- The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology#467880
Record · ID 768707
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive