PhilArchive
open access
The Ontological Argument: Past, Present, and Future?
This article serves to explore the historical development of the ontological argument from Anselm to Present. Initially, the main goal is to introduce the lay reader to one of the most perplexing arguments for the theistic conception of God. Logically, this is an a priori argument, similar to one of a mathematical proof. Oddly, the argument has sort of fallen out of place in contemporary philosophy, apart from a reboot from Alvin Plantinga. The goal is to illustrate that the initial argument as stated by Anselm seems to be an unsolved problem in philosophical inquiry.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On The Logical Formalization of Ansem's Ontological Argument#767988
- Thomas Aquinas On Knowledge#763830
- Heideggerian Epistemology as a Source of Kuhn's Concept of the Growth of Knowledge#757507
- Introduction#708088
- Mind as a Relay to the Stars: The Ontological Ultimatum#88672
Record · ID 769201
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive