PhilArchive
open access
"Understanding the Demandingness Objection"
This paper examines possible interpretations of the Demandingness Objection as it is supposed to work against Consequentialist ethical theories.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Obligation, Accountability, and Anthropocentrism in Second-Personal Ethics#86712
- The Domination of No Subject: Legal-Rational Rule as the Political Form of Morality#687870
- Closing the Is–Ought Gap through First-Person Integrity: The MEPR/UOF Framework in Dialogue with Analytic Philosophy#690136
- From Global Collective Obligations to Institutional Obligations#777990
- So What's My Part? Collective Duties, Individual Contributions, and Distributive Justice#700007
Record · ID 769362
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive