PhilArchive
open access
Can a Significance Test Be Genuinely Bayesian?
The Full Bayesian Significance Test, FBST, is extensively reviewed. Its test statistic, a genuine Bayesian measure of evidence, is discussed in detail. Its behavior in some problems of statistical inference like testing for independence in contingency tables is discussed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evidence and Credibility: Full Bayesian Significance Test for Precise Hypotheses.#770664
- Bayesian Evidence Test for Precise Hypotheses#770612
- Toward a Grammar of Bayesian Confirmation#713080
- The Problem of Measure Sensitivity Redux#703568
- Is there a place in Bayesian confirmation theory for the Reverse Matthew Effect?#763535
Record · ID 770624
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive