PhilArchive
open access
Cognitive Constructivism, Eigen-Solutions, and Sharp Statistical Hypotheses
In this paper epistemological, ontological and sociological questions concerning the statistical significance of sharp hypotheses in scientific research are investigated within the framework provided by Cognitive Constructivism and the FBST (Full Bayesian Significance Test). The constructivist framework is contrasted with the traditional epistemological settings for orthodox Bayesian and frequentist statistics provided by Decision Theory and Falsificationism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Statistical Compatibility, Refutational Information, and Acceptability#1069769
- Credal sensitivism: threshold vs. credence-one#735556
- Critiques de la falsifiabilité de Karl Popper#766984
- Should epistemology take the zetetic turn?#111999
- Paraconsistent Sensitivity Analysis for Bayesian Significance Tests#770865
Record · ID 770627
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive