PhilArchive
open access
Concept stretching. The case of deliberation
Sartori (1970) warned a long time ago of the danger of concept stretching for effective and cumulative theory building. Such concept stretching has happened with regard to deliberation, which has become a very faddish term. For theoretically well-founded empirical research it is better conceptually to distinguish clearly between strategic bargaining and deliberation, although in the empirical political world the two concepts are usually heavily intertwined. Keywords deliberation; concept stretching; strategic bargaining
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Motivated Reasoning in Political Information Processing: The Death Knell of Deliberative Democracy?#763166
- Management of Political Skids in the Age of the Internet and Cybernetics: A Critical Analysis of a Conceptual Migration#74042
- Experimentalismo versus Hermenéutica: G. Deleuze#759018
- Shaping Concepts of Technology: What Concepts and How To Shape Them.#487913
- Change Your Way of Thinking. A Neo-Fregean View on Conceptual Engineering#91051
Record · ID 770638
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive