PhilArchive
open access
Three Problematics of Linguistic Vulnerablity: Gadamer, Benhabib, and Butler
Debates in feminist political philosophy often focus on what problematic(s) to use in order to understand normative ideals, gendered differences, and their histories. For the purposes of this chapter, I will contrast two important problematics in these debates, the procedural/deliberative politics in the tradition of Critical Theory, represented here by Seyla Benhabib, and the poststructuralist or postmodern politics, represented here by Judith Butler. The goal of the contrast will be to set up the contribution that Gadamer’s work can make to contemporary feminist philosophy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Amy Allen: The Politics of Our Selves: Power, Autonomy, and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory#742008
- Who's to Blame for Injustice? Joseph Rouse's Poststructuralist Critique of Enactivist Ethics#98470
- Broaching the difference between intersubjectivity and intersubjection#741690
- “Me Too”: Epistemic Injustice and the Struggle for Recognition#742102
- Desi feministing : blogs and politics : an interview with Samhita Mukhopadhyay#215990
Record · ID 770982
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive